Professional consensus
Veterinary, behaviour and dog-training bodies, plus kennel and dog-welfare organisations, that have published statements, codes or policies opposing aversive tools or requiring reward-based practice.
Showing 21–40 of 166. This is a working record of publicly aligned positions.
Training and behaviour organisations
Supports the Joint Standards of Practice and education in humane, evidence-based behaviour work.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“There are no training or behavior cases which justify the use of intentional aversive punishment-based interventions.”
States there are no training or behaviour cases that justify intentional aversive punishment-based interventions.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“Members must not use, recommend, advertise or sell choke chains, prong collars or electric shock devices.”
Members must not use, recommend, advertise or sell choke chains, prong collars or electric shock devices.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“Actively reject the use of harsh, physical, psychological, coercive and aversive methods including electric shock collars, pinch or prong collars.”
Members reject harsh, coercive and aversive methods, including shock collars and prong collars.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“Treats electronic training collars as unnecessary and a form of cruelty. Full members must not use them.”
Treats electronic training collars as unnecessary and a form of cruelty. Full members must not use them.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“Electric shock in the guise of training constitutes a form of abuse and should no longer be a part of the training toolbox.”
Regards electric shock used as training as a form of abuse and campaigns to remove these devices from the supply chain.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“Electrical stimulation has no part in ethical dog training and should be banned from sale for training use.”
Electrical stimulation has no part in ethical dog training and should be banned from sale for training use.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
PPG chapter whose members work to force-free standards and oppose shock and prong equipment.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Supports reward-based training and opposes aversive tools that rely on pain or fear.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“There is never a need to resort to methods that cause harm or distress in order to effectively train dogs. The sale and use of shock collars should be banned.”
Holds that goals claimed to justify aversive devices can be reached with positive reinforcement and supports a ban.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“We are opposed to the use of electronic training devices and pinch collars, believing they are unacceptable and unnecessary.”
Signed the UK joint statement opposing electronic training devices and pinch collars.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
UK clinical behaviour body whose members work to evidence-based, welfare-centred practice without aversive tools.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Trains clicker and positive-reinforcement practitioners and endorses the Joint Standards of Practice.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Teaches force-free behaviour work and rejects shock and prong as training tools.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Endorses the Joint Standards of Practice and trains force-free, science-based practitioners.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Promotes handling and training that reduce fear, anxiety and stress rather than pain or intimidation.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Teaches force-free, evidence-based dog training and does not support aversive tools.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Membership standards are built around force-free, reward-based dog training.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Joint Standards of Practice partner teaching constructional, force-free behaviour change.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Joint Standards of Practice partner expecting humane, evidence-based training of assistance dogs.
Read moreThis page is a reference list of publicly available position statements, codes and policies. Inclusion here means the published wording aligns with ICLAC’s aims. It does not mean that the organisation has formally endorsed ICLAC or joined ICLAC.